Our Boston Massacre Moment

The parallels are striking and undeniable. An unpopular, external military force shoots and kills protesters haranguing the officers, demanding they leave. Snowballs are thrown.

British soldiers panicked and fired on the crowd in Boston, killing five and wounding six more.

More than 255 years later, an Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) officer shot three times and killed Renee Good, mother of three, as she attempted to leave the scene.

What became known as the Boston Massacre in 1770 inflamed the colonists and dramatically escalated resistance to British tyranny. It rallied the population for independence and became an important precursor to the American Revolutionary War.

The British soldiers were arrested for murder the next morning and, controversially, were represented by John Adams at trial, who believed above all else in justice, due process, and the rule of law. (Adams later became America’s second president.)

What will happen now after the murder of Renee Good? Despite the obvious similarities with the Boston Massacre, there are differences too.

There is no John Adams for the officer, just a collection of inexperienced sycophants now populating the Justice Department. Perhaps that’s one more reason why Jonathan Ross, the officer who fired through the windshield and side windows of Good’s car was immediately whisked away and protected by ICE, which has blocked access to evidence and refused to allow Minnesota officials to be part of any investigation.

Unlike the Boston Massacre, the details of which remain murky (were the soldiers ordered to fire on the crowd?), there is video of the killing in Minneapolis for all the world to see. It is shocking and unambiguous.

We cannot sit by idly any longer. We must demand an open trial of this ICE officer. We must peacefully stand and be heard, here and across the nation, that this militarized, deliberately provocative invasion of our cities cannot continue. Let this be our Boston Massacre moment.

Similar Posts

  • Proposed OMB Rule would give Political Commissars Veto Power on All Federal Science Grants

    A new federal rule, OMB 0034-2026, hands the White House direct political control over every federal research grant. Buried in dull bureaucratic language, it lets the Office of Management and Budget—now run by Project 2025 architect Russell Vought—override the individual agencies that have always tailored their own grant processes. Its core move, Section 200.205, installs presidential appointees inside every agency with sole authority to approve or deny grants. Peer review by working scientists still happens, but its verdicts become merely advisory—and appointees are actually pressured to reject the proposals experts rate highest. Grants must align with administration priorities, can be killed at any time on a whim, and are barred from researchers tied to advocacy groups, foreign collaborators, or public communication. The OMB actuaries no longer just audit; they command. It is a unitary seizure of power over American science, the very basis of our prosperity and standard of living, and the time to fight it is now through public comments

  • The March 28 Debrief: What We Got Right and What We Fix Next

    A few days after the No Kings rally in Lexington, Lexington Alarm held a debrief session to gather reactions. There were several successes and a few things to change before our next event.

    At a post-event debrief on Zoom, organizers, marshals, volunteers, and participants went through the rally piece by piece. The consensus: it was a success. Nearly 2,000 people attended, more signs were sold than at the 6,000-person October rally, and close to 100 new contacts signed up at the tables. The mood among volunteers was described repeatedly as “uplifting.” The table setup was the best yet — positioned closer to the crowd than in October, generating real conversations, sign sales, and genuine engagement with organizational literature.

  • General Meeting Wed, Jan 14th

    2026 will be the second year of Lexington Alarm!. it was exciting as we quickly came together around Patriots Day in 2025 to proclaim “No King, No Tyranny” and “In America, the Law is King” during the town celebrations. We quickly stuck a chord, distributing thousands signs, hosting large rallies and standouts, culminating in our Oct 18th No Kings Rally on the Battle Green, which was the 2nd largest in the state.

    But now we face the Valley Forge Years, the “winter of our discontent”. Many of the worst aspects of what we feared came to pass. Some did not. Many institutions and media capitulated to non-confrontation rather than uphold the values they still believed in. There was also resistance. But above all, the same dark anti-democratic forces we feared retained and used their power. It is hard to maintain commitment and enthusiasm when you have to pick and choose your battles.

    This meeting will give us a chance to reflect on our role in 2026. What should be our commitment. What should be our battles?

  • Lexington Alarm!’s New Research on Shutting Down ICE Flights at Hanscom Field

    Lexington Alarm! has completed a research project on how Hanscom field was developed as an airport for small regional airplanes only, and how the use of large planes there by ICE may be illegal under Massachusetts laws and regulations. Use of Hanscom by commercial air service is limited to airplanes with 60 seats or less, and the ICE charters are clearly in violation of this.

  • How Should Lexington Alarm Approach a crisis Election?

    The midterm elections are shaping up not simply as a chance to take power in
    the House and Senate but to lay the groundwork for what our country might
    become in the years after 2028. If we are to preserved a multi-racial democracy in the United States, we must start with this years election.

    (Photo: Photo: Black Voters Matter, voting rights rally in Montgomery, Alabama, 5/17/2026. (Credit: photojones.co)- From MVP)