The March 28 Debrief: What We Got Right and What We Fix Next

A few days after the No Kings rally in Lexington, Lexington Alarm held a debrief session to gather reactions. There were several successes and a few things to change before our next event.

At a post-event debrief on Zoom, organizers, marshals, volunteers, and participants went through the rally piece by piece. The consensus: it was a success. Nearly 2,000 people attended, more signs were sold than at the 6,000-person October rally, and close to 100 new contacts signed up at the tables. The mood among volunteers was described repeatedly as “uplifting.” The table setup was the best yet — positioned closer to the crowd than in October, generating real conversations, sign sales, and genuine engagement with organizational literature.

Marshal coordination, led by Charlie Bauer and Margaret Heitz, drew particular praise. Twenty-one marshals were deployed with detailed preparation materials, diagrams, and clear protocols for crowd management and emergency response. The Lexington Police Department cooperated closely throughout. “The town was very pleased,” Bauer noted. “We were organized.”

The bus contingent to Boston — roughly 75 people marching behind the Lexington Alarm banner a couple of blocks to the Common — was a highlight. Tourists stopped. WBUR was there as we got off our buses and did a quick interview. People took pictures. People clapped as we marched into the center of the crowd. One participant said they felt “like a militia coming in from Lexington.” Exactly what we hoped to invoke, albeit in a peaceful manner fitting our movement strategy.

The group identified three things that should be fixed prior to our next large event. First, sound. People more than a moderate distance from the stage could not make out words. Concord’s same-day rally had a professional system audible from anywhere. The group discussed renting a professional rig with a technician ($1,500–$2,000 per event).

Second, the insurance problem is unresolved. Six insurers declined to cover the event. The town had made having an insurance binder a requirement for our permit. Through assistance from the Board of Selectmen, the town agreed to issue the permit, but said that was a one time occurance. Insurance companies throughout the country have been pressured by Trump’s allies not to provide coverage for No Kings rallies so this may be a continuing issue. What happens to political speech when outsiders try and repress it in this way, and how can our town respond? A meeting with the Select Board and Town Manager was proposed, and hopefully we will have further discussions on this issue.

Finally, there was confusion about the Minutemen who were to practice on the green until 11 am that morning. We had not known of this until a day before the event, and the town asked us not to start our speaking program until 11:00 am. But the Minuteman instead decided very kindly to move to St. Brigit’s, allowing us to start closer to our normal time. However the confusion did cause us to tell Rep Katherine Clark that she could not speak in Lexington since we could not accommodate her schedule. The whole situation means we need more coordination with the town for future events, particularly as we represent a large and vocal group of Lexington residents, all supporting locally our call to “resist tyranny.”

One detail from the day: a 99-year-old Lexington resident from Brookhaven attended and had one request — to be there when the official count was taken. He was counted by our Marshals.

Similar Posts

  • How Lexington Alarm helped set the Stage for Public Discussion of Hanscom ICE Flights

    The recent letter from Maura Healey demanding that ICE halt flights out of Hanscom and the Boston Globe article examining ICE flights from Hanscom Field was the result of months of organizing, research, and coalition-building by Lexington Alarm and allied groups across the region. Far from being a sudden media moment, the story reflected a growing public effort to bring transparency and accountability to the use of a Massachusetts state facility for immigration enforcement operations.

    The issue first gained momentum after a Freedom of Information Act request revealed that Massport had knowledge of ICE-related charter flights at Hanscom but was not fully sharing that information with the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission. This lack of disclosure raised the possibility that Massport was deliberately keeping information about ICE flights from the Commission.

    In response to the Commission’s request for this data and our desire to increase public scrutiny, Lexington Alarm and partner organizations launched a coordinated letter-writing campaign directed at Massport executives, the Massport Board of Directors, and Governor Maura Healey. To make participation easy and accessible, we developed an online tool that allows individuals to send letters directly to Massport and the Governor both electronically and via regular mail.

    As of this week over six hundreds of letters and emails were sent. This response demonstrated that concern about ICE flights from Hanscom extended well beyond Lexington and involved residents across multiple communities.

  • Massport Has Facilitated over 6,000 ICE Deportations and Removals Through Hanscom

    Dec 10, 2025 – A new record of ICE flights from Hanscom Field, prepared by Human Rights First, suggests that over 6,000 individuals were flown out of Hanscom Field to U.S. prisons and/or unknown international destinations between January and November 2025.

    There were 114 ICE flights out of Hanscom since January, and Massport has denied any knowledge of these flights to the Hanscom Field Advisory Commission in an obvious lie. This report documents every ICE deportation flight departing Hanscom and charts the number going to various destinations, as shown below. With an average passenger load of 54 per flight, total ICE operations at Hanscom have involved more than 6000 people.

    The Batavia ICE facility in Buffalo, where the greatest number of flights are headed, has a capacity of 650 beds. Buffalo is also a transfer point to Moshannon, an ICE prison near Phillipsburg, PA. According to Investigative Post, a Buffalo-based nonprofit news organization, there are frequent reports of overcrowding and of detainees being forced to sleep on gymnasium floors

  • New Campaign: Tell Massport to Stop ICE Flights

    We are escalating our pressure on the Massachusetts Port Authority with a direct letter-writing campaign to Massport Leadership and the Board of Directors. Over 2,000 residents have been forcibly removed from Hanscom Field , their due process rights recklessly disregarded by an authority that claims ignorance. We demand Massport stop hiding behind federal preemption and use its full regulatory power to protect our community.

  • Burlington Passes Anti-ICE Town Meeting Resolution

    The Burlington Town Meeting voted nearly unanimously to condemn violations of local zoning laws and the inhuman conditions of detention at the ICE district facility in Burlington. The resolution called for ICE to cease overnight and extended detentions at the Burlington facility and to comply fully with the conditions they agreed to when they first…

  • We Are All Minneapolis

    Alex Pretti, a 37 year old nurse known by neighbors as an amiable man in his neighborhood was murdered by federal ICE agents today in Minneapolis.

    Alex was not the target of any investigation. He was using his iphone to film the violent threats of ICE agents in the street, and he was talking to another woman filming the scene. ICE agents approached him and the woman, wrestled him to the ground, and after he had been subdued one agent took out a gun and fired up to ten shots killing him. His last words, to the woman who was pinned to the ground near him as they were pepper sprayed, were “all you alright?”

    We are at war. No sense mincing words. Until we tear the present DHS agency down to the ground and start with a new structure, no one in America is safe.

  • Proposed OMB Rule would give Political Commissars Veto Power on All Federal Science Grants

    A new federal rule, OMB 0034-2026, hands the White House direct political control over every federal research grant. Buried in dull bureaucratic language, it lets the Office of Management and Budget—now run by Project 2025 architect Russell Vought—override the individual agencies that have always tailored their own grant processes. Its core move, Section 200.205, installs presidential appointees inside every agency with sole authority to approve or deny grants. Peer review by working scientists still happens, but its verdicts become merely advisory—and appointees are actually pressured to reject the proposals experts rate highest. Grants must align with administration priorities, can be killed at any time on a whim, and are barred from researchers tied to advocacy groups, foreign collaborators, or public communication. The OMB actuaries no longer just audit; they command. It is a unitary seizure of power over American science, the very basis of our prosperity and standard of living, and the time to fight it is now through public comments